Attitudinal Instruction:
Structured Design for Attitudinal Instruction

Note: The theory overview presented here is all but directly quoted from Dr. Reigeluth's summary. Only minor edits have been made by me for my own clarity. (see bottom of page for full citation)

Author

  • Thomas F. Kamradt & Elizabeth J. Kamradt (Indiana University)

[back to top]

Goals & Preconditions

  • The primary goal of this theory is to help a learner change an attitude. it is intended for situations in which the learner is willing to reconsider an existing attitude.

[back to top]

Values

  • Attitude development or change.
  • Learners having a choice as to whether or not to work on changing an attitude.
  • Events to help the learner maintain a new attitude and transfer it to real-life situations.

[back to top]

Methods

General Strategy

  • Simultaneously move all three components of the attitude (affective, cognitive, and behavioral) the same amount in the same direction using rapid shifts in instructional tactics, from one component to another.
    Offer a safe environrnent in which to try on the new attitude.

Specific Tactics

  • 1. Activate the attitude: Present a situation which calls for its use (behavior).
    -Can be direct or indirect activation.
    -The action should be slightly inconsistent with the learner's existing attitude and in the direction of the target attitude (adjust if necessary). This creates dissonance.
  • 2. Diagnose the dissonant component(s) by asking:
    -How did that situation make you feel? (affective)
    -What were you thinking? (cognitive)
    -Why did you do what you did? (behavioral)
  • 3. Address whichever component is most dissonant.
    -If affective, use operant conditioning techniques.
    -If cognitive, use persuasion.
    -If behavioral, use demonstrations and practice for the action.
  • 4. Consolidate the attitude at one point on the continuum before proceeding.
    -Include explicit transfer events and an organizational development plan.

A. Audience is willing or open to change their existing attitudes (p.581)
B. Different subject matter has different emphasis (Variable Proportion p.571)
C. Different learners have different emphasis (Learning Styles p.571)
D. Simultaneously move all three components of attitude the same amount in the same direction (p. 564)
E. Change should occur incrementally, not all at once (p.585)
F. People use attitudes to meet their needs (p.573)
G. Attitudes function very quickly, and often quite subconsciously (p.569)
H. All learning contains all three attitudinal components, but not in equal proportion. (p.571)
I. Learners will not risk damaging existing, proven attitudes (p.581)
J. They must believe the new attitude is possible and achievable (p.581)
K. Dissonance should be minimized and kept short in duration. (p.581)
L. To sustain an attitude change, ongoing support is needed. (p.590)

[back to top]

Major Contributions

  • This model is a highly ethical, humane, approach. It recognizes the interdependence of the three components of an attitude. It is personalized to address the most dissonant component first and recognizes that every attitude is a tool which its owner uses to resolve a need

Additional Resources

 

Note: The theory overview presented here is all but directly quoted from Dr. Reigeluth's summary. Only minor edits have been made by me for my own clarity. (see bottom of page for full citation)

Source: Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured Design for Attitudinal Instruction. Ch. 23 in Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. II. C.M. Reigeluth (ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Knowledge Base Home | Joel Galbraith's Home

Page last modified: Friday, September 17, 2004